I’m sure you’ve
all heard the phrase, “wise old owl.” For some reason, we symbolize wisdom with
owls, but why must they be old owls?
Why can’t they be young or even baby owls? Well, the “old” adjective
points to another cultural assumption: the older you get, the wiser you become.
Quintilian even says as much when he notes that “greater authority is
attributed to old men, as they are thought to have known and seen more than
others” (424). Amazingly, age is a factor that may contribute to a speaker’s
(or rhetorician’s) ethos.
With the above
context in mind, I had a mini mind-blown moment after reading this: “[S]tudy
affords us such advantage, that, as far as knowledge of events is concerned, we
seem even to have lived in past ages” (424). When you were little, did you ever
think it’d be sweet to live several hundred
years instead of seventy years? (I
used to have a very romantic idea of the Victorian age). What experiences, what
knowledge, could you have after living several lifetimes? Well, Quintilian
basically says that the way to live lifetimes in a life is through study,
through reading the words of people across the ages: “We now compute, not how
many years we have studied, but how many we have lived” (427).
Others before us
have done the hard work of discovery and debate, and so now we have the easier
task to just learn from them (427). We have access to a “shortcut” which allows
us, in a short period of time, to glean lessons from people who devoted their
entire lives to a particular subject. Sometimes novelists write sentences like,
“She seemed older than her years accounted for.” Rather than a poor girl who
had to “grow up” quickly because of tragedy, what if the “she” in the sentence
is referring to a writer or rhetorician? I’ve never considered that idea that
extensive study could “add years” to your life—and that this uncanny,
unphysical “old age” could substantially increase your ethos appeal. 
No comments:
Post a Comment