In Rhetorica ad Herennium Book IV and the
section about the figures of thought, the example of Antithesis stood out to
me. On page 255 it says, “Antithesis occurs when the style is built upon
contraries” and it give many examples, one including “when all is calm, you are
confused; when all is in confusion, you are calm.” This example, along with the
several other examples listed, reminded me of something you would read on a
fortune cookie: some words of wisdom or a vague prophecy.
Since style is
often associated with pathos and “concerns the artful expression of ideas”,
according to the online rhetoric, provided by Dr. Gideon Burton of
Brigham Young University, I can see how antithesis would play its part. Contradictory
statements are sure to affect an audiences’ pathos while still expressing an
idea in a tasteful way. Contradictory statements, like the ones listed on page
255, play an appeal to my pathos because I begin to question which
contradiction is correct, if any. My pathos also becomes puzzled by what the
contradiction is really trying to
say, if anything or if it is just some line to get me thinking with no real
answer. I think this method is not as frequently used today, or even back in 84
B.C.E when Rhetorica ad Herennium was
first written, because of how perplexed it could leave an audience. But then
again if the point of a speech or written work were meant to confuse/puzzle the
audience then this would be a good form of thought to use. Even if I can only
connect this use of antithesis to fortune cookies, I’m sure there are other
modern day connections that could be made, it is interesting to see how this
form of thought and how the forms of diction also discussed are still apart of
style today.
No comments:
Post a Comment