When speaking to any audience, it is vital to first determine what type of audience it is and then adjust style accordingly. If the style chosen is inappropriate, the speaker or writer is doomed to alienating the audience before he or she even begins. And that is an issue of the utmost significance. In De Oratore, Antonius explains that "nothing in oratory ... is more important than to win for the orator the favor of his hearer" (Cicero 328). If a speaker uses the same style for a political speech on television that he does while chilling with his friends at the local pub, his audience is likely to be surprised and disgruntled. Not much favor won there. And so the impact of the entire speech declines significantly.
Sunday, September 28, 2014
The Appropriate and Audience
Of the texts we have read so far, I think that Cicero's work has the most interesting take on style and its connection to audience. In Orator, Cicero tells us of what he sees as the three styles of speech (plain, middle, and vigorous) but notes that "the man who controls and combines these three varied styles needs rare judgment and endowment" (339). This is because "nothing is harder than to determine what is appropriate" (Cicero 339). Cicero then specifically notes that this difficulty occurs both in speaking and in writing both poetry and prose (339).
When speaking to any audience, it is vital to first determine what type of audience it is and then adjust style accordingly. If the style chosen is inappropriate, the speaker or writer is doomed to alienating the audience before he or she even begins. And that is an issue of the utmost significance. In De Oratore, Antonius explains that "nothing in oratory ... is more important than to win for the orator the favor of his hearer" (Cicero 328). If a speaker uses the same style for a political speech on television that he does while chilling with his friends at the local pub, his audience is likely to be surprised and disgruntled. Not much favor won there. And so the impact of the entire speech declines significantly.
Now that I either have taken or am in the process of taking all of the writing courses required for graduation plus a few, I feel rather secure in saying that, for me, the writing major has been more about addressing the appropriateness and audience issue than anything else. We have devoted almost no time to grammar and specific details about certain kinds of writing are usually forgotten. However, what I try desperately not to forget is how each piece of writing must be adjusted for its intended purpose and audience, just like the graphic included in this post indicates. All the types of writing we do and all the different audience scenarios we are given have helped me learn how to adjust my writing in this way. For an example, check out my own or other posts. My diction, grammatical constructions, and other elements of craft are utilized differently here than they would be in, say, a research paper. Because y'all don't want to read that here, and I know it.
When speaking to any audience, it is vital to first determine what type of audience it is and then adjust style accordingly. If the style chosen is inappropriate, the speaker or writer is doomed to alienating the audience before he or she even begins. And that is an issue of the utmost significance. In De Oratore, Antonius explains that "nothing in oratory ... is more important than to win for the orator the favor of his hearer" (Cicero 328). If a speaker uses the same style for a political speech on television that he does while chilling with his friends at the local pub, his audience is likely to be surprised and disgruntled. Not much favor won there. And so the impact of the entire speech declines significantly.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Nathan, this is a very well-written post, and you make good use of the graphic as well! Some people might claim that writing is a “free” enterprise, but truly, audience is one of the biggest constraints a writer must deal with in a rhetorical situation. We can think about audience in many different ways—for instance, understanding their emotional make-up, which a lot of these ancient rhetoricians focus on—but I appreciate how you emphasized appropriateness in consideration of audience. But what would you do for a mixed audience? If you had to give a presentation about the Art Wave application in a venue hosting laypeople, experts, and managerial personnel, which group would you cater to? I suppose this goes back the quote you included in your blog post: “Now the man who controls and combines these three varied styles needs rare judgement and great endowment” (339). On one hand, we may interpret this quote in light of Aristotle’s advice: “[W]e should vary the type of style, so that the middle succeeds the grand and the simple the middle, and then again interchange them, and yet again. Thus by means of the variations, satiety is easily avoided” (252). Basically, you must sometimes vary the types of style within the same piece (even if the overall piece may be labeled “grand” or “simple”), and you must have good judgment to do this tastefully. On the other hand, we could interpret Cicero’s quote as referring to the necessity of combined styles for a mixed audience. In such a situation, the rhetor certainly would need “rare judgment and great endowment”!
ReplyDelete